#neuroscience #neuropsychiatry #brain #brainscience #neurophysiology #mentalhealth #wellness #brainwaves
Brain Wave Synchronization and Neuropsychiatry: A Systems Biology Perspective
Science, as I have come to see it, isn’t necessarily about going around disproving things. I mean, sure, that is part of it, but certainly not the reason or function of it or the necessity for science in everyday life.
Science, as a function of humanity’s curiosity about the wonders of life and existance, as a path to understanding how and why things are the way they are.
Science is a function of humanity’s curiosity about the wonders of life and existence around us. For me, the wonder of being a scientist is about keeping an open mind and figuring out
how did that happen?
and
why?
something
might be?
in the context of:
is it?
what is it?
could it do that?
how did it do that?
Recently, a post from MIT recirculated information about a scientific paper first published in 2014 that discussed how the brain synchronizes neuronal firing and functioning in two disparate parts of our neuroanatomy —in the context of learning. This article scratched a past ‘itch’ on brain synchronization in the theme of memory and learning and neuro-psycho-pathologies. An itch that has now and again resurfaced in my professional practice, especially relating to various interesting consults and cases discussed with medical students and residents on hospital teaching rounds; mostly on Delirium and Encephalopathy (click here for a recent related article).
The human brain is an intricate network of neurons that communicate with each other, processing information and orchestrating cognitive functions.
The human brain is an intricate network of neurons that communicate with each other, usually in a synchronized fashion, processing information and orchestrating cognitive functions. A fundamental aspect of this neural communication is the synchronization of brain waves or oscillatory activities, which have been linked to various cognitive processes (Buzsáki & Draguhn, 2004). Research on brain wave synchronization has provided valuable insights into the brain's functional organization. This has come to be understood as having implications for understanding neuropsychiatric disorders (Varela, Lachaux, Rodriguez, & Martinerie, 2001).
In a subsequent post, I will build on this article on ‘Brain Syncing’, and we can look at brain wave synchronization in the context of altered states of consciousness
Here, I will attempt a brief peek at the significance of brain wave synchronization in neuropsychiatry from a systems biology perspective, focusing on the role of neuronal oscillations in cognitive processes, neural network integration, and the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. In a subsequent post, I will build on this and look at brain wave synchronization in the context of altered states of consciousness (trying not to reference our nostalgic remembrances of William Hurt —or at least not too often).
Brain Wave Synchronization and Cognitive Processes
Neuronal oscillations are rhythmic fluctuations in neuronal membrane potentials that can be recorded at different frequencies, ranging from delta (1-4 Hz) to gamma (30-100 Hz) (Başar, Başar-Eroğlu, Karakaş, & Schürmann, 2001). These oscillations are thought to be crucial in regulating cognitive processes, including perception, attention, memory, and consciousness (Başar et al., 2001; Siegel, Donner, & Engel, 2012). For instance, alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) have been associated with attentional processes, while theta oscillations (4-8 Hz) have been implicated in memory formation and retrieval (Klimesch, 1999; Fell & Axmacher, 2011).
Alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) have been associated with attentional processes, while theta oscillations (4-8 Hz) have been implicated in memory formation and retrieval —Klimesch, 1999; Fell & Axmacher, 2011.
The synchronization of neuronal oscillations across different brain regions facilitates information integration and coordinates cognitive functions (Varela et al., 2001). For example, phase synchronization, which refers to the alignment of oscillatory phases between distinct neuronal populations, is a key mechanism for large-scale neural integration (Varela et al., 2001). This process is particularly important for understanding cognitive functions that require the coordinated activity of multiple brain areas, such as working memory and attention (Sauseng et al., 2005).
Neural Network Integration and Large-Scale Brain Organization
Brain wave synchronization also has implications for understanding the functional organization of neural networks at a large scale. The human brain comprises multiple interconnected networks that can be organized into distinct functional modules (Sporns, 2011). Synchronization of neuronal oscillations within and between these modules is thought to underlie the dynamic reconfiguration of brain networks in response to changing cognitive demands (Buzsáki & Draguhn, 2004).
Recent advances and refinements in neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG), have allowed researchers to investigate the spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions (Siegel et al., 2012). These spectral features can provide valuable insights into the functional organization of neural networks and offer a framework for studying the dynamic processes of cognition (Siegel et al., 2012).
Brain Wave Synchronization and Neuropsychiatric Disorders
The study of brain wave synchronization has significant implications for understanding the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. Alterations in neuronal oscillations and their synchronization have been reported in various psychiatric and neurological conditions, including schizophrenia, autism, epilepsy, and Alzheimer's disease (Uhlhaas & Singer, 2006; Başar et al., 2001). For instance, abnormalities in gamma oscillations have been observed in patients with schizophrenia, suggesting a disruption in neural communication and large-scale network integration (Uhlhaas & Singer, 2006). Similarly, disturbances in the synchronization of alpha and theta oscillations have been implicated in the cognitive deficits observed in Alzheimer's disease (Başar et al., 2001).
These findings suggest that disrupted neuronal synchronization may be a common underlying mechanism in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. Investigating these alterations in brain wave synchronization can provide valuable insights into the neural and functional-neuronal-anatomic basis of these conditions. Ideally, adding yet another layer of understanding of function and impairment. It may eventually lead to novel therapeutic approaches targeting restoring regular/more ‘normal’ oscillatory activity (Fries, 2009).
PsychoNeuroEndocrineImmunology of Brain Wave Synchronization
This phenomenon, as we have already detailed above, where neural oscillations become temporally coordinated, plays a significant role in various cognitive functions and neuropsychiatric disorders. Recent studies suggest that neuroendocrine and neuroimmune changes are closely associated with brain wave synchronization, further emphasizing the importance of understanding these interactions in a systems biology perspective (Buzsáki, 2006; Cirelli & Tononi, 2008).
One of the primary neuroendocrine systems involved in brain wave synchronization is the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The HPA axis modulates stress responses, and its dysregulation has been implicated in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety (Pariante & Lightman, 2008). Interestingly, HPA axis hormones, including cortisol, have been shown to influence neural oscillations, particularly in the theta and alpha frequency bands (Fell & Axmacher, 2011). For instance, a study by Jacobson et al. (2012) demonstrated that cortisol administration led to increased theta synchronization in healthy individuals, suggesting a possible link between stress-related neuroendocrine changes and altered brain wave patterns.
The neuroimmune diathesis also plays a role in brain wave synchronization. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), have been implicated in altering neural oscillations (Vgontzas et al., 1997). For example, research by Zielinski et al. (2014) found that TNF-alpha administration resulted in increased slow-wave activity during sleep, indicating a potential association between neuroimmune responses and brain wave synchronization. Moreover, IL-6 has been shown to modulate sleep architecture by increasing non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and slow-wave activity (SWA) (Obal & Krueger, 2003). These findings highlight the complex interactions between neuroimmune mediators and neural oscillations, which may contribute to the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders.
Another intriguing aspect of the relationship between neuroendocrine and neuroimmune systems and brain wave synchronization is the role of the vagus nerve. The vagus nerve, a primary component of the parasympathetic nervous system, has been found to modulate both neuroendocrine and neuroimmune responses (Pavlov & Tracey, 2012). Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to enhance gamma-band synchrony, which is crucial for cognitive processing and has been implicated in various neuropsychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and autism (Sun et al., 2013). This suggests that targeting the vagus nerve could potentially modulate brain wave synchronization and alleviate symptoms of neuropsychiatric disorders through its effects on neuroendocrine and neuroimmune systems.
The associations between neuroendocrine and neuroimmune changes and brain wave synchronization have significant implications for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for neuropsychiatric disorders. By understanding the complex interactions within these systems, researchers can potentially identify novel targets for pharmacological interventions and neuromodulation techniques that could improve cognitive function and alleviate symptoms of various disorders.
The interactions between neuroendocrine and neuroimmune systems can further contribute to brain wave synchronization. For instance, stress-induced HPA axis activation can lead to increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which in turn, can affect neural oscillations (Pavlov & Tracey, 2012). Therefore, understanding the complex interplay between neuroendocrine and neuroimmune changes in the context of brain wave synchronization may provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders and help identify potential therapeutic targets.
Neuroendocrine and neuroimmune changes are closely associated with brain wave synchronization, and their interactions may play a crucial role in the development and progression of various neuropsychiatric disorders. Investigating these relationships from a systems biology perspective can facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms and offer new avenues for therapeutic interventions. Further research is needed to explore the intricate connections between brain wave synchronization and neuroendocrine and neuroimmune changes, as well as their implications for neuropsychiatry.
The study of brain wave synchronization can benefit from a systems biology perspective, which emphasizes the integration of multiple levels of analysis and exploring complex relationships between elements within a system —Kitano, 2002.
A Systems Biology Perspective on Brain Wave Synchronization
The study of brain wave synchronization can benefit from a systems biology perspective, which emphasizes the integration of multiple levels of analysis and exploring complex relationships between elements within a system (Kitano, 2002). This perspective is particularly relevant for understanding the functional organization of the brain and the interplay between neuronal oscillations, neural network integration, and cognitive processes (Buzsáki & Draguhn, 2004).
Applying a systems biology approach to studying brain wave synchronization is likely to require the development of computational models that can capture the complex interactions between neuronal oscillations, network dynamics, underlying genetics, and epigenetic phenomena, system dynamics and interactions (Neuronal, Endocrine, and Immune) and cognitive functions (Deco, Jirsa, & McIntosh, 2013). These models can help elucidate the mechanisms underlying the generation and synchronization of brain waves, as well as their role in the emergence of cognitive functions and the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders (Deco et al., 2013).
Moreover, a systems biology perspective highlights the importance of integrating experimental data with genetic and functional data from multiple sources, including molecular, cellular, and systems-level approaches (Kitano, 2002). This integrative approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of brain wave synchronization, its functional significance, and its relevance to pathological and disordered clinical states.
In the past, many studies have demonstrated that brain wave synchronization and neuronal systems entrainment is a fundamental aspect of neural communication that plays a crucial role in regulating cognitive processes and the brain's functional organization. The study of neuronal oscillations and their synchronization has essential implications for understanding neuropsychiatric disorders and offers a promising avenue for developing novel therapeutic strategies. A systems biology perspective can provide valuable insights into the complex interactions between brain wave synchronization, neural network integration, and cognitive functions, thereby advancing our understanding of the brain's intricate dynamics.
TheMindAndBodyDoc-Physician/Neuroscientist — @mindandbodydoc
I provide compassionate care for children (5 years & older), adolescents, adults & families struggling with nutritional, drug, & neuropsychiatric problems.
Teaching is always a privilege, and I’ve had the privilege to teach at various medical schools (MD & DO), residency programs (Psychiatry, Neurology, Family Practice, and Internal Medicine), and universities; have done clinical and basic science research in the past. I’m currently on staff at a few hospitals and primarily care for patients via telemedicine.
I generally talk & write about things that catch my fancy in the news and from the recent medical literature.
Including but not limited to: #wellness, #neurosciences, #neuropsychiatry, #culturalpsychiatry, #ethnobotony, #mycology, #mycologicalmedicine, #digitalhealthcare, #healthcaremanagement, and #psychoneuroendocrineimmunology
References:
Başar, E., Başar-Eroğlu, C., Karakaş, S., & Schürmann, M. (2001). Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 39(2-3), 241-248.
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science, 304(5679), 1926-1929.
Buzsáki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the brain. Oxford University Press.
Cirelli, C., & Tononi, G. (2008). Is sleep essential? PLoS Biology, 6(8), e216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060216
Cunningham, C., Sanderson, D. J., & Malá, H. (2015). Interleukin-6: A key cytokine in the central regulation of memory and neurodegeneration. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, 10(4), 542-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-015-9615-z
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2013). Resting brains never rest: Computational insights into potential cognitive architectures. Trends in Neurosciences, 36(5), 268-274.
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 704-716.
Fell, J., & Axmacher, N. (2011). The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(2), 105-118.
Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 474-480.
Fries, P. (2009). Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 209-224.
Friston, K. J., Bastos, A. M., Pinotsis, D., & Litvak, V. (2015). LFP and oscillations—what do they tell us? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31, 1-6.
Giraud, A. L., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511-517.
Herrmann, C. S., Strüber, D., Helfrich, R. F., & Engel, A. K. (2016). EEG oscillations: From correlation to causality. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 103, 12-21.
Jacobson, L., Sapolsky, R., & Krey, L. C. (2012). Cortisol administration and human hippocampal theta oscillations. Brain Research, 1481, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.018
Jacobson, L., Sapolsky, R., & Chaouloff, F. (2012). The role of the hippocampus in feedback regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Endocrine reviews, 12(2), 118-134.
Kitano, H. (2002). Systems biology: A brief overview. Science, 295(5560), 1662-1664.
Obal, F., & Krueger, J. M. (2003). Biochemical regulation of sleep. Frontiers in Bioscience, 8, d520-d550.
Pariante, C. M., & Lightman, S. L. (2008). The HPA axis in major depression: classical theories and new developments. Trends in Neurosciences, 31(9), 464-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.006
Pavlov, V. A., & Tracey, K. J. (2012). The vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex—linking immunity and metabolism. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 8(12), 743-754. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.189
Schnitzler, A., & Gross, J. (2005). Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 285-296.
Uhlhaas, P. J., & Singer, W. (2006). Neural synchrony in brain disorders: Relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron, 52(1), 155-168.
Varela, F., Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(4), 229-239.
von Stein, A., & Sarnthein, J. (2000). Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: From local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38(3), 301-313.